The Final Convergence

Sola Scriptura, Bible Alone

Menno Zweers is a discernment researcher and author of multiple works in biblical apologetics and prophetic studies. A Dutch-born American living in Tennessee, he spent four decades in NAR-influenced Christianity before a Sola Scriptura reorientation shaped by careful, honest engagement with the full counsel of Scripture. He writes with prophetic urgency and pastoral conviction for everyone who is hungry for truth that does not shift with the cultural moment. “Buy the truth, and sell it not.” — Proverbs 23:23

Published: May 22, 2026 | thefinalconvergence.com

Yesterday we established that the gospel is good news, and that good news requires bad news to be understood as good. We looked at the holiness of God as the standard, the sinfulness of man as the problem, and the wages of sin as the consequence.

Today I want to go deeper into the first of those, because in the modern church, the holiness of God has been so consistently softened, so carefully managed, so thoroughly subordinated to the attribute of love that most believers have never encountered it in its full biblical weight. And that absence, the absence of the holy God from the functional theology of the contemporary church, is not a minor gap. It is the gap from which every other theological error flows.

You cannot understand sin correctly without the holiness of God, because sin is only sin in relation to a standard, and the standard is His holiness. You cannot understand the atonement correctly without the holiness of God, because the cross is only necessary if the standard is absolute and the failure to meet it is genuinely catastrophic. You cannot understand grace correctly without the holiness of God, because grace is only grace if what it overcomes is genuinely deserved. You cannot understand the gospel correctly without the holiness of God, because the gospel is specifically the announcement of how the gulf created by His holiness has been crossed.

Start with a manageable God and you end with an unnecessary cross. Start with the holy God of Scripture and everything else falls into its proper place.


What the Modern Church Has Done With Holiness

The dominant presentation of God in the contemporary church, the God of the megachurch sermon series, the God of the therapeutic Christian book, the God of the seeker-sensitive worship experience, is primarily defined by love. He loves you. He has a wonderful plan for your life. He is for you, not against you. He wants you happy, whole, fulfilled, and living your best life. None of these statements is entirely false. God does love. He does have purposes for His people. He is for those who are in Christ.

But the God who emerges from this presentation is not the God of Scripture. He is a scaled-down version of God, a version with the holiness carefully removed or repositioned as a secondary attribute that His love consistently overrides. A version that makes the cross not a necessity but a choice, not the only possible response of a holy God to the problem of sin, but a gracious gesture by a loving God who could have handled it other ways.

And a God whose love does not require the cross is a God whose love is indistinguishable from sentimentality. “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). No darkness at all. Not, God is mostly light. Not, God has a great deal of light and is working on eliminating the remaining darkness. No darkness. At all. The absolute, unqualified, categorical statement of what God is; light, pure, holy, without any admixture of darkness whatsoever.

The God of Scripture is not a God who looks at human sin and weighs it against His affection for the sinner and decides the affection outweighs the offense. He is a God in whom there is no darkness at all, which means His holiness does not accommodate sin, does not overlook it, does not decide it is ultimately not that serious. His holiness demands that sin be dealt with, completely, finally, justly. Which is why the cross was not optional.


Three Encounters With the Holy God

The Scripture records three encounters with the holiness of God that together give us a complete picture of what His holiness is and what it produces in those who genuinely encounter it.

Isaiah in the Temple (Isaiah 6:1-5)

We examined this briefly yesterday. But it deserves fuller attention, because Isaiah’s response to the encounter with divine holiness is the most complete biblical description of what genuine exposure to God’s holiness produces.

Isaiah was in the temple. He saw the Lord high and lifted up. The seraphim, whose name means burning ones, whose very existence is defined by proximity to divine holiness, covered their faces and their feet and cried holy, holy, holy.

And Isaiah, the prophet, the righteous man, the man who had spent his life in service of God, said: “Woe is me! for I am undone.” Undone. The Hebrew word means destroyed, silenced, ruined. Not convicted in a productive, growth-oriented way. Genuinely undone, the recognition that in the presence of absolute holiness, everything he was fell catastrophically short.

“Because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts.” His specific area of confession, unclean lips, was the area of his greatest gift and calling. He was a prophet. His lips were his instrument of ministry. And in the presence of divine holiness, even his greatest gift was unclean. Not his worst failures. His finest offering.

That is what the holiness of God does. It does not merely expose the obvious failures — it exposes the inadequacy of the finest human offering made to the holiest standard in the universe.

Peter at the Miraculous Catch (Luke 5:1-8)

The encounter is recorded in Luke 5. Jesus has just produced an impossible catch of fish, nets so full they were breaking, and Peter’s immediate response was not gratitude, not excitement, not the natural human reaction to witnessing a miracle. “When Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus’s knees, saying, Depart from me; for I am a sinful man, O Lord.” Depart from me. Not, stay and do more miracles. Not, this is wonderful, let us talk about what else you can do. Depart from me, the instinctive response of a sinful man who suddenly understood, in the presence of genuine holiness, that his own condition was incompatible with that presence.

Peter did not receive a theological lecture on sin. He encountered holiness, the holiness of the incarnate Son of God manifested through the miracle, and the encounter produced in him an immediate, visceral, accurate self-assessment. I am a sinful man. The knowledge did not come from an argument. It came from the encounter. This is why the preaching of the holy God is not primarily an intellectual exercise. It is the means by which the Spirit of God produces in the hearer the genuine recognition of their own condition before the God they are encountering in the Word.

John on Patmos (Revelation 1:12-17)

The apostle John, the disciple whom Jesus loved, the man who had leaned on Jesus at the Last Supper, the man who had stood at the foot of the cross, received the vision of Revelation on the island of Patmos.

And when he turned to see the voice that spoke to him, when he encountered the risen, glorified, exalted Christ, his response was: “And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead.” As dead. Not overwhelmed in an exciting way. Not transported in a blissful mystical experience. As dead, the complete physical and emotional collapse of the human person in the presence of absolute glorified holiness.

Three encounters. Three responses. Isaiah, undone. Peter, depart from me. John, as dead. Not one of them produced the response that modern worship culture has taught believers to expect from an encounter with God, the warm, emotionally elevating, personally affirmative experience of divine love and acceptance. Not because God is not loving. But because genuine holiness does something to the human soul before love can do anything else. It shows the soul its own condition.


Why This Matters for the Gospel

The reason the church has largely removed the holy God from its functional theology is not theological carelessness. It is pastoral pragmatism. The holy God is uncomfortable. The holy God produces in people the responses Isaiah, Peter, and John experienced, and those responses are not good for attendance figures, for giving patterns, or for the reputation of a church as a welcoming, affirming community. So the holy God has been replaced, gradually, with the best of intentions, by the loving God who affirms, the gracious God who accepts, the therapeutic God who heals wounded self-esteem.

And the catastrophic pastoral consequence is a church full of people who have been told they are loved by God without ever being shown why that love required the cross. Who have been told they are forgiven without ever understanding what the offense was. Who have been told they are accepted without ever grasping what they were accepted from.

“Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins” (1 John 4:10). Propitiation. The word the modern church barely uses, the turning away of wrath through the offering of an atoning sacrifice. The love of God is not the decision of a generally benevolent deity to overlook the problem of sin. It is the decision of a holy God to satisfy His own righteous demands through the substitutionary sacrifice of His Son, so that the sinner could be genuinely, legally, finally forgiven without the holiness of God being compromised.

That is love. Real love. Holy love. Love that took the cross seriously because sin is serious and holiness is absolute. Not the sentimental affirmation of a God who cannot bring Himself to say anything difficult to His beloved children. The holy love of a God in whom there is no darkness at all, who loved sinners enough to send His Son into the darkness that they had created in His world and to bear its full consequence on the cross.


The Worship the Holy God Produces

When the holiness of God is genuinely understood, when the encounter is real rather than managed, the worship it produces is entirely different from the emotionally driven corporate experience that fills most contemporary Christian services. It is the worship of Isaiah after the coal touched his lips. The worship of Peter after he was told to fear not. The worship of John after the risen Christ placed His hand on him and said “I am the first and the last.”

It is worship that knows what it is worshipping. That has understood why the worship was necessary. That has stood at the edge of the gulf and seen it crossed, not by its own effort, not by its own religious sincerity, but by the finished work of a holy God who was also a loving God and who refused to allow holiness to exclude the sinner whom love was determined to save.

That worship will not be manufactured by a worship band at the right volume with the right lights. It will be produced by the encounter with the holy God, in the Word, preached faithfully, applied by the Spirit, received by faith.

And it will produce in the worshipper not the temporary emotional elevation of a well-produced service but the settled, profound, life-altering peace of someone who has understood what they were saved from, and by whom, and at what cost.

“Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.” — Isaiah 6:3 KJV


📖 The Simplicity of the Gospel: What It Is, What It Is Not, and Why Everything Else Falls Short Available now on Amazon in paperback and Kindle. Written by Menno Zweers | Book 2 Get your copy on Amazon →


thefinalconvergence.com | Follow on Instagram, Facebook, X, and YouTube

Posted in

Leave a comment